May 20th, 2009 by Joshua Weinberger

Continuing with Day 2 of the 3rd International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media in San Jose this week.

For tweets from other #AAAI / #ICWSM attendees, check the Summize results here. Follow Jessica’s tweets at http://twitter.com/jesstsai

Tue May 19 9:01:57    Speaking: Duncan Watts, Yahoo! Research, “Using the Web to do Social Science.”

Tue May 19 13:38:15   ”How does [system] design impact online community culture?” Panel Discussion

Tue May 19 15:05:13   Now Speaking: Tad Hogg, HP Labs, “Stochastic Models of User-Contributory Websites”

Tue May 19 15:31:42   Up Now: Christian Wolff, University of Regensburg, Germany, “Personal Information Mgmt vs. Resource Sharing”

Tue May 19 15:59:09   Next Up: Oded Nov, Polytechnic Insti. of NYU, “Motivational, Structural and Tenure Factors that Impact Online Community Photo Sharing

Tue May 19 16:55:57 Final Session: Michaela Götz, Cornell Univ., “Modeling Blog Dynamics”

[Details after the break...]

Tue May 19 8:59:45    Join the ICWSM group online at Crowdvine

Tue May 19 9:01:57    Speaking: Duncan Watts, Yahoo! Research, “Using the Web to do Social Science.”
Tue May 19 9:15:31    “My real interest is to think of the Web as a *tool* for social science research” – Watts
Tue May 19 9:16:36    dynamics of networks: Individual level has a lot of turnover and change, but evens out and stabilize at aggregate level – Watts
Tue May 19 9:18:13    Watts asks why are there “cultural hits” in the market – difficult to predict what will be popular
Tue May 19 9:23:19    Hypothesis: inequality and unpredictability derives from “social influence” – Why pay attention to others? Learn what u may not know
Tue May 19 9:25:34    Study: Created [social environment] Music Labs. Recruited 28K people for study. Presented with 48 songs by unknown bands
Tue May 19 9:27:58    Song in the Top 10 got more listens. Not surprised that indiv. influence each other, but what consequences are for market formation
Tue May 19 9:29:45    “Inherent unpredictability” – No matter how much information you have, you still won’t be able to predict effect of social influence
Tue May 19 9:32:35    Implications of Music Lab: it’s possible to study emergence experimentally – would be difficult to do in offline world
Tue May 19 9:37:42    Some argue that Americans are increasingly sorting themselves into like-minded comm. – Bad thing bc we don’t learn/exchange ideas
Tue May 19 9:40:06    Goel, Mason, Watts, develop “Friend Sense” Application – Quiz to see how well you know your “friends”
Tue May 19 9:40:54    Perception and reality not in line;Model ur friends & projection bias. Ppl are really terrible at knowing when their friends disagree
Tue May 19 9:44:19    Watts’ study raises the question of how much individuals really influence each other
Tue May 19 9:45:55    Watts’ next study: Performance-based pay better than fixed-pay? Can you get better work with better pay?
Tue May 19 9:50:49    Amazon Mechanical Turk (AMT) – current leading platform from crowd sourcing.
Tue May 19 9:53:09    People always think they’re being underpaid no matter how much they’re being paid.
Tue May 19 9:54:01    “Anchoring effect” responsible for lack of impact on accuracy/quality.
Tue May 19 9:55:42    Would you work harder if your employer doubled your pay? Most people think they’re already working hard enough.–Watts
Tue May 19 9:56:37    All platforms (Facebook, AMT, Email networks, Web) offer new tools to study social interactions and collective dynamics. – Watts
Tue May 19 10:49:03    “Networks have gone from being too small to too big in a blink of an eye” – Watts

Tue May 19 13:38:15   “How does [system] design impact online community culture?” Panel Discussion #ICWSM
Tue May 19 13:41:25    Panelists: Cathy Gill, Lukas Biewald, Dolores Labs; Rashmi Sinha, SlideShare; Cameron Marlow, Facebook
Tue May 19 13:42:38   Correction: Moderator – Kathy Gill, Senior Lecturer, University of Washington
Tue May 19 13:53:51   Q: Biggest predictor of your activity? a) Distribution; b) Feedback? c) What Your Friend’s Are Doing? A: C – Marlow
Tue May 19 14:06:42   Moderator Question: Tell us a time when a behavior was not what you expected, and what did you learn from that?
Tue May 19 14:07:30  ”You know when someone untags a photo, it’s probably not accidental.” -Marlow
Tue May 19 14:08:30   How do you balance intuition+data in developing new features?
Tue May 19 14:08:53   Sinha: Start with intuition, then become more data driven.On a SNS, so much opp to listen to ppl talk, see how they’re using it, react
Tue May 19 14:09:34   When do you know you should rollback a feature? The first minute people say they hate it? Or wait?
Tue May 19 14:13:49   Sometimes you get emotionally attached, hold onto features longer than should have. You should roll back pretty quickly – Sinha
Tue May 19 14:16:50   The advantage of SNS is that you can get qualitative feedback directly from users; run experiments on features that way – Biewald
Tue May 19 14:20:52   ”The best job we can do is making sure ppl in charge of making decisions are aware of all biases in [design systems]” – Marlow
Tue May 19 14:23:50   Hashtags on Twitter are “Distributed conversations” anyone can track. Really scalable convos, more than any other mechanism. – Sinha
Tue May 19 15:00:40  Startups and smaller orgs have a better chance of staying in touch with their user communities – Gill

Tue May 19 15:05:13   Now Speaking: Tad Hogg, HP Labs, “Stochastic Models of User-Contributory Websites”
Tue May 19 15:16:34   Hogg is focusing on the phenomenology of Digg (users submit/vote on stories they like & friend those they want to follow).
Tue May 19 15:30:37  Reasons users vote for story not available on Digg. Conjectures: story topic, novelty, popularity – Hogg

Tue May 19 15:31:42   Up Now: Christian Wolff, University of Regensburg, Germany, “Personal Information Mgmt vs. Resource Sharing”
Tue May 19 15:34:09  Focus of talk is on “tagging motivations – why do people tag and how does motivation differ from platform to platform” -Wolff
Tue May 19 15:38:35  Tagging – a fourth layer of indexing, behind 1) author keywords; 2) intellectual indexing by prof.; 3) automatic indexing
Tue May 19 15:40:02  Wolff finds tags are usually noun oriented, almost all tags reflect aspects of content, instead of time, task, emotion, sentiment
Tue May 19 15:42:09   Amazon’s Mechanical Turk seems to be a preferred platform for these social studies
Tue May 19 15:54:40   Not surprising: Youtube & Flickr more for Resource Sharing, while Delicious and Connetea are more for Personal Information Mgmt (PIM)
Tue May 19 15:58:16    More to be done in helping people to better organize tags (e.g., auto tagging suggestions, teach professional classification systems)

Tue May 19 15:59:09   Next Up: Oded Nov, Polytechnic Insti. of NYU, “Motivational, Structural and Tenure Factors that Impact Online Community Photo Sharing
Tue May 19 16:00:15   “Why do people share stuff in online communities?” – Nov
Tue May 19 16:00:56   “If you don’t have users sharing goods, you don’t have community.” – Nov
Tue May 19 16:01:44    Understanding *why* they share is essential to know how to sustain the community — Nov
Tue May 19 16:04:43   2005 paper by @dweinberger [David Weinberger] on “Tagging and Why It Matters”
Tue May 19 16:11:16     Content “creation” is independent of “sharing” – Nov
Tue May 19 16:15:32    The more contacts you have, the more likely you’ll do what is expected of you in context of community (e.g., share photos on Flickr)
Tue May 19 16:17:28    People share less the longer they’re in the community – Nov
Tue May 19 16:18:38    Enjoyment (r=.022) not statistically significant in sharing; conflicts with user self-reports that enjoyment is primary reason – Nov
Tue May 19 16:20:29   Enjoyment may lie more in the “creation” rather than the “sharing” – Nov
Tue May 19 16:25:13    Negative correlation btwn “self-development” (-.182) and sharing: Nov suspects that discrepancy comes from quality/quantity trade-off

Tue May 19 16:55:57 Final Session: Michaela Götz, Cornell Univ., “Modeling Blog Dynamics”
Wed May 20 17:00:57 Find Gotz’s research here
Wed May 20 17:02:17  Gotz proposes “Zero-crossing (ZC)” model that eval. inter-posting time, “burstiness” of posting activity, and popularity over time.
Wed May 20 17:04:21   Gotz says the model could be used for forecasting, viral marketing campaigns, and Web advertising, but admits it may be a “long shot”
Wed May 20 17:06:50   ”Poster-Demo Madness” Session – each presenter has ONE minute to whet our appetites

No comments yet.

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.



 
RSSFeed

Get Adobe Flash playerPlugin by wpburn.com wordpress themes
Home | Get CRM Magazine | CRM eWeekly | CRM Topic Centers | CRM Industry Solutions | CRM News | Viewpoints | Web Events | Events Calendar
About destinationCRM | Advertise | Getting Covered | Report Problems | Contact Us